That's what will be created when work is finished on the KMOS instrument and it's attached to the Very Large Telescope (VLT) in Chile.
KMOS stands for K-band Multi-object Spectrometer (I don't write the names, I just report them!)
Basically it sees in infrared. And it has 24 little arms which move around the field of vision and focus in on specific galaxies, taking detailed spectra of each of them. Only 16 of the arms had been installed when the picture on this blog was taken.
The whole thing has to be kept in a giant metal drum to ensure it is super freezing cold.
Sometimes our fans and viewers send pictures I just cannot ignore - and some have come in today that are well worth sharing.
First, this one from a Twitter used called @kritzikratzi
He informs us that he is using Professor Poliakoff as his new university folder icon... And sent photographic proof.
I like it, but I see enough of The Professor each day and don't think I could handle him staring out of my computer screen.
The other picture which caught my eye today was a tattoo.
It comes from a viewer named Matt (pictured right), but I don't know if it the same Matt who sent us the rock pictures earlier today!?
Matt said: "My name is Matt and I am a fan of periodicvideos. To this e-mail I have attached a photo of me watching the new carbon video as well as a photo of my tattoo of a caffeine molecule. Thank you for the great videos and keep up the good work!"
Here's the tattoo... Looks real to my untrained eye!
And I showed the pictures to Professor Poliakoff from the Periodic Table of Videos... He said: "The circular depressions suggest to me that it might be slag from a blast furnace. Slag is quite light and has holes from the gas bubbles coming out of the process. However, I'm not a mineral expert."
I also showed our cult hero technician Neil Barnes, who said he'd like a bit of the sample sent to him for testing!
Many people have asked for more information about the rock to help with identification.
The viewer (a chap named Matt) has supplied these details:
Coin used in picture is Canadian 25 cent. Does not float in water. It is not magnetic at all. It was found on St. James Street, in Sault Ste Marie Ontario, Canada. I have measured it at 7 centimeters long, and 3 centimeters wide. It leaves no visible coloration if I scratch a piece of paper with the rock. It is very hard, as I tried to use a metal file to scratch it but it barely even made a mark. The very few parts that did come off, did not dissolve in water, nor did they change color. I unfortunately do not have hydrochloric acid, nitric acid or sulfuric acid to test with, sorry.
Perhaps the best advice so far came from someone on Twitter who suggested Matt "ask his local university's geology/chemistry department".
One of our viewers has sent us some pictures of a substance, asking for help identifying it.
Thought I'd share it here on the blog to see if anyone can help.
The sender (called Matt) said: "I have been watching your videos and I was wondering if you could help me identify a mysterious rock I found when I was young.
"I live in Canada, Ontario, and have never found a similar rock like this before, I am hoping you can help me identify what it is.
"After many hours of searching the net, the closest resemblance I could come up with is raw Titanium.
On a recent visit to the Royal Observatory Edinburgh I was shown the amazing Crawford Collection.
This assortment of historic science texts includes amazing tomes by Galileo, Copernicus and Newton - to name just a few.
It was amazing being able to actually thumb through first editions of the Principia and De revolutionibus - surely two of the most important science books ever written.
I can't even imagine how much money some of these books are worth.
Nick said: "I'm an animation student from London and I find all these science videos really interesting. Just thought I'd do a quick drawing to show my appreciation."
For me, this is showing what science is really like...
What it really looks like in the lab... how they really feel about it.... what they really do.
And it also contains some discussion about what really happens next as papers are published.
Encouragingly, viewers have posted some great comments in response to the videos.
They seem to really want this type of in-depth and honest explanation.
Among many, this is my favourite comment so far: "You at the University of Nottingham have amounted a truly fantastic body of work on youtube, revolutionising the way science is brought to the masses in such an inspirational way. As an undergraduate electronic engineer, these glimpses of real physics in action are the motivation I crave. Before videos like this there was no way to see how science happens with the same accessibility level. I wish the whole science community made the effort to be as transparent and easy to comprehend as you guys."
The mini-stars are actually tiny specks of plasma made by firing one of the world's most intense lasers, known as Vulcan.
Vulcan is a so-called petawatt laser.
It produces so much energy in such a short space of time I won't even bother writing all the big and small numbers... You can check out the official website for that stuff.
They do have one cool claim though... for 1 picosecond (0.000000000001 seconds) the laser beam is 10,000 times more powerful than Britain's National Grid.
That super intense laser is fired at a tiny target (and I mean tiny), which is unsurprisingly destroyed.
The target (pictured) is stripped of its electrons and a strange plasma forms for the briefest of moments.
Another slightly strange but amusing message from a periodicvideos viewer!
It is this animated GIF image, from a YouTube user called poorsoulja.
It came with the following explanation:
"I was scrubbing through your video and couldn't help but to capture the moment... Its a few frames of you, put together to look like cheesy stop-motion dancing (nothing vulgar)
"Silly, I know.... this is not what I spend all my time doing, btw. :)
We get asked dozens of questions every day and it's impossible to deal with all of them... But in this case I asked our experts to respond.
Here is what they said: Professor Poliakoff wrote: "The question about the stability of atomic masses 4, 12, 16, is interesting and concerns an area miles away from my expertise, namely the synthesis or, if you prefer, birth of elements inside stars. The process which begins with H atoms and then involves fusion i.e. H2 + H2 --> He In the end the abundance of different isotopes depends on both the fusion reactions occurring in the stars and also on the relative stability of combinations of different numbers of protons and neutrons. The overall result is more complex than just multiples of 4. However, I don’t know enough to explain it further – even professors have their limits."
Dr Debbie Kays said: "There is a relatively low cosmic abundance of stable isotopes of Be (and also Li and B, actually) in the universe. The lack of 8Be is in contrast to other elements with atomic masses with multiples of 4 (such as 12C, 16O etc). 8Be is formed by helium burning reactions in stars but it is very unstable (with an extremely short half life). Although I’m not a nuclear physicist, it seems that 8Be is so unstable due to the fact that when it decays via alpha emission it produces two stable, self-contained 4He atoms which drives this decay process. In stars, the transient 8Be can also undergo a reaction with another 4He atom to form 12C, as LarryJayCee described, which can then undergo further reaction with another 4He to form 16O.
"The most stable isotope of beryllium is 9Be. This isotope is likely formed by fragmentation reactions in space, which can happen when high energy heavier elements in cosmic rays collide with the 1H or 4He atoms in cosmic gas and break apart.
"I didn’t know that there are speaker models out there which have beryllium in them! They seem to be pretty expensive from what I can see, this may well be due to the quality of the sound obtained from them, but also might due to the challenge of handling toxic beryllium reactants. I’m not sure of the advantages of having these speakers as I’m not a connoisseur of music but I assume that you can obtain higher frequencies with them due to the low molecular weight of beryllium."
One of the best thing about projects like The Periodic Table of Videos is the idea that we're inspiring people to talk and think about science.
And luckily we see plenty of comments and emails to confirm this.
Here's a recent email that brought smiles to our faces:
"I just wanted to say Thank You to everyone at The Periodic Table of Videos. I saw your video on YouTube about the 'Chemical Garden', and I had to tell my Chemistry Club teacher about it. He took my idea and we used it yesterday at our Chemistry Club meeting. Thank You for you're wonderful ideas because that was probably one of the best experiments that we have done at my school! :)"
ISIS is a huge facility (and I mean huge) where they crash beams of protons into metal targets, producing neutrons.
Those neutrons are then used by scientists to probe materials at the atomic level.
Here's a video looking around the complex.
There's plenty more to come from ISIS... For example, here is just a little extra snippet discussing the powerful magnets used to steer the proton beam.
Blog goes behind the scenes with video journalist Brady Haran.
Brady's working on various projects, including the successful Periodic Table of Videos, Sixty Symbols and Numberphile.