tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-44780290347799730.post3607242590933905853..comments2024-03-28T22:59:50.001-07:00Comments on Periodic Videos: Pi and The Simulated Bouncing BallsBradyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12339819735220226666noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-44780290347799730.post-23862250901845898622019-03-22T23:16:39.635-07:002019-03-22T23:16:39.635-07:00Yes it will be. But then you would have to have th...Yes it will be. But then you would have to have the ratios of the two balls according to the powers of the number base you are working in.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10744049798700312718noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-44780290347799730.post-69905826546135706672016-10-06T07:23:31.252-07:002016-10-06T07:23:31.252-07:00شركة نقل عفش بابها
شركة نقل عفش بنجران
شركة نقل عف...<a href="http://emc-mee.com/transfer-furniture-abha.html" rel="nofollow">شركة نقل عفش بابها</a><br /><a href="http://emc-mee.com/transfer-furniture-najran.html" rel="nofollow">شركة نقل عفش بنجران</a><br /><a href="http://emc-mee.com/transfer-furniture-hail.html" rel="nofollow">شركة نقل عفش بحائل</a><br /><a href="http://emc-mee.com/transfer-furniture-dhahran.html" rel="nofollow">شركة نقل عفش بالظهران</a><br />Sarah Saadhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03862316474270607416noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-44780290347799730.post-11561962360575192082013-04-27T06:49:10.403-07:002013-04-27T06:49:10.403-07:00Also gravity does not come into this example at al...Also gravity does not come into this example at all, we're moving in the horizontal plane without friction. You could just as easily set this example in deep space. Nice observation about g and pi though :PAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17839089790093791464noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-44780290347799730.post-59156784544969568822013-01-02T12:17:17.466-08:002013-01-02T12:17:17.466-08:00No; g and π are not related. Remember, the exact v...No; g and π are not related. Remember, the exact value of g = 9.80665 m/s^2. π^2 ~ 9.86, which would round to 9.9. 9.9 and 9.8 are not the same value; what you observed is a coincidence. Not bad for a 13-year-old, though =)Joshiehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02286897786105019529noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-44780290347799730.post-64066572929360117822012-12-13T18:13:48.723-08:002012-12-13T18:13:48.723-08:00Is it just as elegant if you use a different numbe...Is it just as elegant if you use a different number base?Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03590573878500874404noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-44780290347799730.post-1826744376924775432012-11-03T20:04:00.123-07:002012-11-03T20:04:00.123-07:00I THINK I found out why this happens... I found it...I THINK I found out why this happens... I found it when I was playing with my calculator after science class. I told it to find the square root of 9.8m/1sec/1sec, the rate of acceleration due to gravity. It showed me ~3.033, which made me think of pi. So, I told it to multiply pi by pi. Guess what. I got ~9.869. Even though it wasn't exactly 9.8, it had 9.8 IN it. Coincidence? Is the rate of acceleration on earth actually pi squared? Do people even make square pies? Is it that square pies fall at a rate of ~9.86960406437476m/s/s? Why did I just ask those two questions? Lol, ok, that's enough. Just a side note: I'm 13. :DAaronhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04180931656427358628noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-44780290347799730.post-74585408324935620522012-04-11T15:41:42.241-07:002012-04-11T15:41:42.241-07:00Is there any chance at all of seeing the full vide...Is there any chance at all of seeing the full video with Prof. Ed? Yeah, his notes have been uploaded, but honestly I'd much rather hear him talk about the maths behind it, because it's just not easy to understand something like this from looking at a single sheet of paper with notes. I think it's a shame that it's been cut out, for one it's a really interesting fact about pi, that I want to see proven, but also because the prof. made the effort of deriving it for us because he probably thought viewers would be interested to see it.<br />I don't understand why it was cut out in the first place. Do you think viewers are afraid of seeing slightly complicated maths? Then why have a channel called numberphile in the first place? The videos on this channel are obviously really well made and keep a lot of people interested, but it's a shame we only get half of the story. Be careful not to underestimate your audience.FishAndChipshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01904221409014097943noreply@blogger.com